Lastly, the result of the data analysis was presented in description of words, not number. In order to get the data, the researcher did observation and recording. Furthermore, the researcher applied discourse analysis under the study of sociolinguistics as an approach to analyze the language, writing, speech, and conversation (verbal and nonverbal) that was appropriate with the purpose of this research. This research was conducted in qualitative design. This research aimed to discover the characteristics of formal and informal talks of lecturers in EFL classroom. It is shown that this measure, though coarse-grained, adequately disti. Nouns, adjectives, articles and prepositions are more frequent in formal styles pronouns, adverbs, verbs and interjections are more frequent in informal styles. An empirical measure of formality, the F-score, is proposed, based on the frequencies of different word classes in the corpus. A formal style is characterized by detachment, accuracy, rigidity and heaviness an informal style is more flexible, direct, implicit, and involved, but less informative. This is achieved by explicit and precise description of the elements of the context needed to disambiguate the expression. Deep formality is defined as avoidance of ambiguity by minimizing the context-dependence and fuzziness of expressions. Formality is subdivided into "deep" formality and "surface" formality. A new concept of formality of linguistic expressions is introduced and argued to be the most important dimension of variation between styles or registers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |